PM Modi slams Sonia Gandhi over remarks on President Murmu, calls it an “insult” to tribals

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has launched a scathing attack on the Congress party, particularly targeting senior leader Sonia Gandhi, over a remark made about President Droupadi Murmu. The controversy erupted following Gandhi’s alleged reference to President Murmu as a “poor thing,” a comment that has sparked intense political backlash. PM Modi condemned the remark, describing it as an affront to India‘s tribal communities and a reflection of the Congress party’s condescending attitude toward the marginalised sections of society.

The Prime Minister’s remarks have reignited the debate on respect for constitutional authorities and the representation of tribal communities in India’s political landscape. The incident underscores the ongoing friction between the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Congress, particularly as both parties position themselves for upcoming state elections and the evolving political landscape post-2024.

What Did PM Modi Say About the Congress Party’s Stance on Tribal Representation?

During his address, PM Modi did not hold back in criticising the Congress leadership. He accused the party of undermining President Murmu’s historic position as India’s first tribal head of state, stating that the opposition’s dismissive tone was not just an insult to her personally but to the entire tribal community.

“The Congress found the speech of a tribal person boring. It is an insult to the entire 100 million tribal population of India,” Modi stated, highlighting what he perceived as deep-seated elitism within the party. He further added that President Murmu’s rise from a humble tribal background to the highest constitutional office should be a matter of national pride, rather than a subject of condescension.

The controversy has gained traction on social media, with BJP leaders and supporters rallying around the issue to criticise Congress for what they term a “disrespectful” attitude toward India’s tribal population.

How Has the Rashtrapati Bhavan Reacted to the Comments?

The Rashtrapati Bhavan, the official residence of the Indian President, has weighed in on the controversy, condemning the remarks directed at President Murmu. Officials within the President’s Secretariat reportedly viewed the comment as unnecessary and disrespectful, further fuelling the public outcry.

The response from the President’s office underscores the gravity of the situation, as it is rare for the highest constitutional authority to directly engage in political disputes. While President Murmu herself has not commented publicly on the matter, the reaction from her office signals the deep unease caused by the remark.

What Does This Controversy Mean for Congress and Its Electoral Prospects?

The political fallout from Sonia Gandhi’s remark could have broader implications for the Congress party, particularly as it struggles to reclaim lost ground in Indian politics. Tribal communities form a significant voting bloc in multiple states, and any perception of disrespect toward them could further alienate Congress from this key demographic.

Political analysts suggest that BJP’s aggressive response is part of a larger strategy to consolidate tribal votes ahead of key state elections. In states such as Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha—where tribal voters play a decisive role—such controversies can influence electoral narratives in the coming years.

The Congress party has yet to issue a formal apology or clarification, a move that some observers believe could further damage its standing among tribal communities. By remaining silent, the party risks reinforcing accusations of elitism and a lack of sensitivity toward indigenous groups.

What Are the Larger Implications of This Political Row?

Beyond the immediate political consequences, this controversy raises important questions about India’s evolving social and political fabric. President Murmu’s election was seen as a landmark moment for tribal representation, and any remarks that appear to belittle her role risk sending a discouraging message to marginalised communities.

The issue also touches upon the broader question of respect for constitutional offices. India’s democracy rests on the principle that elected representatives, regardless of their background, must be treated with dignity and decorum. Political leaders across party lines have called for greater sensitivity in public discourse, emphasising the need to uphold the dignity of high offices.

The row over President Murmu’s alleged insult is likely to remain a focal point in political debates over the coming weeks, shaping narratives around social justice, representation, and political respect.