Trump criticises Zelensky over US aid, calls for Russia-Ukraine peace talks

US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, accusing him of being “ungrateful” for the billions of dollars in financial and military aid provided by the United States. Trump alleged that Zelensky took the funds “like candy from a baby,” claiming that Ukraine had exploited the Biden administration’s willingness to send financial assistance. His remarks come as high-level US officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, prepare for diplomatic talks with Ukrainian representatives in Saudi Arabia.

During an interview with Fox News, Trump condemned the scale of US support under President Joe Biden, stating that Ukraine had received $350 billion in aid without demonstrating sufficient appreciation. He suggested that Zelensky’s approach to securing US support had been overly aggressive, implying that Ukraine had taken advantage of American generosity.

How Does Trump Defend His Russia Policy?

While Trump’s remarks have been critical of Ukraine, he also defended his record on Russia, pushing back against claims that his policies were lenient on Moscow. He highlighted his past actions, including imposing sanctions on Russia and supplying Ukraine with Javelin anti-tank missiles. Despite these measures, he argued that his ability to maintain good relationships with world leaders—including Russian President Vladimir Putin—was an asset to US foreign policy.

Trump maintained that no American president had been tougher on Russia than him, pointing to his administration’s role in blocking the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, a key Russian energy project. At the same time, he stressed that he had been able to get along with Putin, as well as with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

What Are Trump’s Views on European Defense and Nuclear Weapons?

As European nations ramp up their defense efforts, French President Emmanuel Macron has recently suggested that France’s nuclear arsenal could be used to protect the continent. Addressing nuclear deterrence, Trump acknowledged the devastating power of modern nuclear weapons, warning that their use could lead to global catastrophe.

Expressing concern over the vast sums of money spent on nuclear programs, he described these weapons as “monsters” with unparalleled destructive potential. While he did not comment on Macron’s specific proposal, his remarks indicated that he sees nuclear weapons as a costly but unavoidable reality in global security.

Is Trump Pushing for Peace Talks Between Russia and Ukraine?

Trump has recently intensified his calls for negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, expressing concern over the ongoing escalation of the conflict. He claimed that Russian forces were “pounding” Ukraine on the battlefield, a situation he suggested was worsening.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump stated that he was considering imposing large-scale banking sanctions and tariffs on Russia to push for a ceasefire and a final settlement. He urged both sides to engage in peace talks immediately, warning that delays could lead to further devastation.

His stance appears to reflect a strategic approach—criticising Ukraine for its approach to US aid while also signaling potential pressure on Russia. Whether this signals a shift in US foreign policy under his administration remains to be seen, but his remarks highlight an ongoing effort to redefine America’s role in the conflict.

What’s Next for US-Ukraine Relations?

With senior US officials set to meet Ukrainian representatives in Saudi Arabia, the future of American support for Ukraine remains uncertain. Trump’s recent comments suggest that his administration may take a more transactional approach to foreign aid, demanding clearer benefits for the United States in return for financial assistance.

At the same time, his push for peace talks indicates a desire to bring an end to the conflict—though how that aligns with Ukraine’s objectives remains unclear. As the war continues, Trump’s rhetoric will likely shape both domestic debates on US involvement and international perceptions of America’s role in global security.