In a significant development reported on Sunday, Iran’s United Nations envoy, Amir Saeid Iravani, claimed that Iran was exercising its “inherent right to self-defense” in its unprecedented attack on Israel. This statement came during a tense Security Council meeting, following what Iran perceives as a failure by the council to act after Israel’s alleged strike on an Iranian consulate in Damascus earlier this month.

Iravani criticized the Security Council for not maintaining international peace and security, which he argues left Tehran with “no choice” but to respond. Despite the severe actions, Iravani assured that Iran “does not seek escalation or war” but will react to any “threat or aggression.” This rhetoric was echoed amidst a backdrop of over 300 missiles and drones launched by Iran over Tel Aviv, marking a severe escalation in regional tensions.

During the same Security Council session, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep concern over the potential for a broader conflict. “Neither the region nor the world can afford more war. The Middle East is on the brink,” Guterres stated, emphasizing the urgent need for “maximum restraint” and an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” in Gaza, which is reportedly on the brink of famine.

Guterres condemned the violent exchanges between Israel and Iran, highlighting the dangerous potential of these actions leading to major military confrontations across multiple fronts in the Middle East.

In contrast, Israel’s Ambassador Gilad Erdan, during the Security Council session called by Israel, urged the council to condemn Iran for their actions, which he labeled as terrorism. Erdan called for comprehensive sanctions against Iran and pushed for the designation of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards as a terror organization. “The snooze button is no longer an option,” Erdan declared, urging immediate and decisive action to penalize Iran for its actions.

The ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel at the United Nations reflects deep-seated geopolitical tensions and the complexities of diplomatic negotiations in conflict resolution. The international community’s response, or lack thereof, to these escalations could set precedents for future international conflicts, highlighting the critical role of the UN in mediating global peace and security challenges.

  humanitarian ceasefire, International Law, Iran, Iran Israel conflict, Israel, Middle East tensions, Tehran self-defense, Tel Aviv missile attack, UN Security Council