Caught cheating, Indian YouTuber strangles husband with dupatta—then dumps body in drain with lover

In a chilling case unfolding in Haryana’s Bhiwani district, a YouTuber named Raveena and her lover Suresh have been arrested by the police for allegedly murdering her husband after he caught the pair in an intimate situation. The crime, which involved strangulation with a dupatta and the disposal of the body in a roadside drain, has stunned the local community and attracted widespread media coverage.

According to police accounts, the incident occurred on March 25, 2025, when Praveen, Raveena’s husband, returned home unexpectedly and found her with Suresh in a compromising position. A heated altercation reportedly broke out. During this confrontation, investigators allege Raveena used a dupatta to strangle her husband while Suresh helped subdue him. The couple then transported Praveen’s body on a motorcycle and dumped it roughly six kilometers away in a drain near Siwani town.

The case began to unravel on March 28 when a decomposed body was discovered in the drain by local residents. Authorities later confirmed the body to be that of Praveen. Surveillance footage played a pivotal role in tracing the suspects. CCTV cameras from a nearby highway recorded Raveena and a man wearing a helmet transporting an object wrapped in cloth—suspected to be Praveen’s corpse—on a two-wheeler. This led to their detention and eventual confession.

What triggered the murder of Praveen in Bhiwani?

Police sources suggest that the motive was rooted in a long-standing extramarital affair between Raveena and Suresh, which had previously caused tension within the family. Raveena had reportedly met Suresh through social media, and their friendship, which began through content collaboration, evolved into a romantic relationship. Despite opposition from Praveen and his relatives, Raveena continued to stay in touch with Suresh.

Raveena and Praveen had been married since 2017 and were raising a six-year-old son. Friends and relatives told investigators that their marriage had become increasingly strained over the past year, allegedly due to Raveena’s growing interest in social media fame and her closeness with Suresh. Her YouTube activities reportedly gained attention locally, and she had built a modest online following before the crime took place.

As the affair deepened, police believe the couple began conspiring to eliminate Praveen, whom they saw as an obstacle to their relationship. Investigators are currently probing whether there were prior attempts to harm him or if the killing was an impulsive act triggered by his sudden return home.

How did the body disposal unravel the murder plot?

The manner in which the body was disposed of proved to be a major clue for authorities. Local residents first alerted police about a foul smell coming from the roadside drain, which led to the discovery of the decomposed body. Investigators noted strangulation marks on the neck and other signs of foul play.

With few immediate leads, officials reviewed hours of footage from traffic and public surveillance systems. A breakthrough came when cameras captured the woman and her accomplice transporting a suspicious bundle wrapped in cloth. Raveena was seen wearing identifiable clothing and riding pillion behind a helmeted rider later confirmed to be Suresh. Police used this footage to locate and arrest the duo.

During questioning, both suspects reportedly confessed to the crime. Raveena admitted to using her dupatta to choke her husband after he found her with Suresh in their home. The duo then planned to remove the body to avoid suspicion, assuming the body would remain undiscovered for longer.

What is the legal status of the accused and their child?

Raveena and Suresh have been charged with murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, along with other sections related to conspiracy and destruction of evidence. Both are currently in judicial custody while the investigation continues. Authorities are also examining whether the murder was premeditated or executed on impulse during a confrontation.

The couple’s six-year-old son, who was reportedly present in the house at the time of the incident, is now in the custody of his paternal grandfather and uncle. Officials are also assessing the child’s mental state and planning to involve child welfare services if required.

What are the broader implications of this case for society and digital culture?

The incident has reignited public concern over the influence of social media on personal relationships and the ethical boundaries in digital fame-seeking. Raveena’s journey from a content creator to a murder suspect has prompted discussion around the mental and emotional toll that online validation can take, especially when it begins to impact family dynamics.

Legal experts believe the case will likely be pursued with a strong focus on digital footprints, including online chats, video uploads, and phone call records. Investigators are also expected to review whether the accused had previously shared any suspicious content that could serve as evidence of intent or motive.

Mental health professionals, meanwhile, have stressed the importance of marital counselling and community support systems in preventing such tragedies. Some argue that the absence of early intervention, combined with growing emotional detachment and external influences, can create dangerous conditions in households already strained by mistrust.

What lies ahead in the investigation and trial?

With the accused now in custody and initial confessions on record, the case is expected to move swiftly through the legal system. Forensic analysis of the crime scene, the motorcycle, and the drain where the body was found will play a crucial role in strengthening the prosecution’s case. Police are also expected to call in forensic psychologists to assess the suspects’ mindset and motive.

Public interest remains high, especially given the sensational nature of the crime and the digital influencer background of the accused. Law enforcement officials are urging the public to refrain from spreading unverified claims online and instead wait for the judicial process to play out.